Robert Abrams
January 30, 2004
These reflections were prompted by a recent
performance of Odissi by the Nayikas Dance Theatre Company, the
New York City Ballet and other sources.
I would like to discuss an issue that is
near and dear to my heart: the methodology of measurement. Is
it possible to develop a method to compare the skill level of
a classical ballet dancer and a classical Odissi dancer? I choose
these two as an initial comparison because both require long discipline
to reach the highest levels and have long choreographic traditions,
yet also have some fairly significant differences.
In classical ballet, one of the highest
achievements a dancer can attain is the ability to dance en pointe,
and hold a position without shaking for some extended period of
time. One of the elements that makes classical Odissi so impressive
is the dancers' ability to stand on one foot without shaking for
extended periods of time. Ballet is normally danced in pointe
shoes and Odissi is normally danced barefoot. Since we are interested
in comparing peak performance to peak performance within existing
disciplines, we can't measure the ballet dancer dancing barefoot,
just as we can't measure the Odissi dancer using pointe shoes.
Such tests would tell us something, but not about the authentic
experience of dancing within each discipline. Our goal is to find
a common, directly comparable measurement that can be derived
from apparently different subject matter. (For an example of a
similar challenge solved by my colleagues and myself, see Stoddart,
Trish; Abrams, Robert; Gasper, Erika & Canaday, Dana. 2000.
"Concept Maps as Assessment in Science Inquiry Learning -
A Report of Methodology" in The International Journal of
Science Education. Volume 22, Number 12, p. 1221-1246.)
I would start by measuring the time from
the top of the arc of a one foot position to the point at which
noticeable shaking begins. Eventually these start and stop times
could be determined by the analysis of digitized video, but it
should be possible to get reasonably accurate results with a team
of three observers who would undergo an inter-rater agreement
training phase.
The ability to hold still is partly a function
of how tired one's body is when the attempt is made. This is an
authentic question when applied to dance because a dancer may
be called upon to hold still at any point in a work. Thus, to
be fully useful, the measurements ought to be taken after a short
warm up, and then again at several points after periods of controlled
amounts of physical exertion. This would mimic the sport of the
Bi-athalon, where people ski and then have to shoot at targets.
I would run these measurements with Odissi
dancers standing on one flat foot, ballet dancers standing on
one flat foot, and ballet dancers standing en pointe. My hypothesis
is that with these three sets of measurements, one could establish
a co-efficient to convert flat footed hold times to en pointe
hold times. I would predict that the co-efficient is at least
partly related to the ratio of the surface area of the flat foot
to the surface area of the pointe part of the pointe shoe.
Once we had all of this data, we could analyse
it to see what kinds of cross-dance conclusions can be drawn.
While it is unlikely to provide exact comparisons between two
specific dancers, it is likely to tell us something about the
differences in dance ability across groups and the changes in
ability over time.
|