Darpana
for Development: Performance and Change
The Darpana Outreach Programme: Performance, Education and
Change
Dr Ralf Yarrow
This article considers three outreach schemes using performance
as a method of developing awareness and inciting activity:
two in sixth grade (age 9-11) schoolchildren in Ahmedabad,
Gujarat; the third in 30 selected villages in North Gujarat.
The projects have been initiated and are operated by Darpana
Academy of Performing Arts with the cooperation of the Ahmedabad
Municipal School Board, the Centre for Environment Research,
the MacArthur Foundation and the Manav Kalyan Trust.
Background
Darpana Aademy for Performing Arts, Usmanpura, Ahmedabad,
was founded in 1948 by Mrinalini Sarabhai. The Artistic Directors
are Mrinalini and Mallika Sarabhai. This centre has a strong
history of relating performance to social and environmental
issues. This originates in work based on classical dance using
traditional themes (for example, Mrinalini Sarabhai's "environmentalist'
Meghadoota), moves into multi-generic forms like Mallika's
Sita's Daughters (dance, music, narrative, acting, reappraisal
of values), and is evident throughtout in the academy's focus
on out merely preserving traditional dance, theater and puppet
forms but also relocating them within the current situation
( such as the celebrated Bhavai performer and teacher kailash
Pandya's work on regeneration of Bhavai, the collection- not
as museum pieces but us practice- of folk dances from all
over India), seeking to reawaken interest in traditional forms
which can then serve as a channel for individual and community
expression. Mrinalini and Mallika conceived 'Darpana for Development'
in 1981-2 as a way of presenting challenging ideas on social
issues (family planning, environmental protection, communal
harmony, women's issues) through performance.
The Projects listed above date from 1994 (Awakening Awareness,
Jagruti) and 1995 (Parivartan) . This article offers a report
to date and an assessment, both of the projects as strategies
for development, and of the use of performance-related activity
as educational and social empowerment. The article is based
on documentation of the projects, interview with project leaders,
team members, teachers, recipients etc., and on direct observation
of performances and subsequent sessions in schools and in
the rural sites.
Brief Description of the Projects
Project
1: Awakening Awareness
Mallika Sarabhai analyses violence in India as of three kinds:
against women or involving women; between groups in the same
religion (e.g. families, tribes, castes); and between religions
(all these also feature in Mallika's performance-piece V for,
performed by her with Darpana/Pan Project from 1995).
This project aims to 'motivate the children' to think about
existing problems and biases… through the medium of 'story-telling',
and the focus is on three major areas, i.e. gender differences,
communal disharmony and color complex. Members of the Darpana
performance troupe form the project team. The stages in the
project are as follows:
-
Performance tells the story; question and answer recap essentials
and internalize the issues for children.
-
Children are asked to reconstruct the story and then perform
it themselves (in groups where appropriate). Project members
offer appropriate performance guidance, such as mime, vocal
projection, positioning.
-
Children are asked to bring newspaper cuttings of similar
events.
-
Selection of stories from these cuttings; the class divides
into groups to work on the preparation of one or two: some
are performers, some provide musical accompaniment or sing
(songs were initially composed by the
-
Performance to others in year-group or school as a whole.
Each stage involves some small-group work including games, discussion,
work on performance skill, encouragement and support for the
process of creating something together.
Project 2: Jagruti
Here
the issues are apparently somewhat more ‘external’
(though clearly Project I also addresses this perception): environmental
and health issues such as water, garbage disposal and air/ energy.
The programme starts with the presentation of a performance
around the topic- often using characters and motifs from the
Gujarati folk from Bhavai- and then moves to check comprehension
and analysis through question-and-answer before giving out questionnaires
bout home practices to be brought back later. Subsequent classroom
activities (some continued in the wider school environment and
at home) include segregation of different kinds of garbage,
making compost pits, initiating community action, making things
from discarded items, collecting press cuttings, drawing diagrams
and pictures, writing and performing poems, songs, and plays
on the issues. Important concerns include stimulating children
to realize they can do something direct about these issues and
creating a domino effect by involving parents and others.
Project 3: Parivartan
The
proposal aims to ‘bring about a change in the conditions
that face the Bhils (pre-Aryan indigenous people of western
India), especially the Bhill women I Banaskantha’ (an
economically and educationally backward area of Gujarat, bordering
Rajasthan) through’ an extended and intensive programme
of education aimed at attitude changes in the areas of social,
cultural, gender and health issues. Thirty to thirty-five villages
were selected to participate. The project has funding for three
years from the MacArthur Foundation and support from the Manav
Kalyan Trust, a social work organization active amongst the
Bhils.
After
training at Darpana, the project team (comprising the creative
director, a local teacher-activist, plus ten performers from
the Bhil community) performs in the villages. Performance is
followed by discussion, both publicly and more informally with
host villagers. Resultant action is monitored on subsequent
visits.
A
fourth project (not assessed here) carried out by Darpana has
involved the use of puppetry to educate villagers about the
benefits of cattle immunization.
A Report
Project
1: Awakening Awareness
I
visited Vidhyanagar HS, Usmanpura and Amrut School, Shahibaug:
the former a local authority Gujarati-medium school, the later
a private English-medium school. In both cases the level of
alertness and participation by the children was impressive,
perhaps more clearly so in the ' public' school: in spite of
a class size of around 60, fairly dingy surroundings and the
fact that the class took place as the last period of a very
long day, the children were eager, bright and imaginative. (In
many classes in Indian schools small-group and participatory
work is very much the exception, partly for economic and plant-related
reasons, partly because of ingrained traditionalist attitudes.)
The
performances the children created were enjoyed hugely by everyone,
and the materials they brought and put together were impressive.
The Darpana performers had clearly established an excellent
rapport with the children; the teachers were cooperative and
interested in the process. The project was not overtly about
teaching performance-skills, except in the sense of making it
clear that learning by doing is highly effective, but the children,
nevertheless, were able to express themselves with gusto and
no little success. Moreover, the project clearly succeeded in
alerting them to the issues involved and getting them to think
for themselves.
As a pilot scheme this looks most promising, and the intention,
as with Jagruti,is to draw in teachers and family-members
and to enable the process to mushroom. It has, moreover, very
significant implications for educational practice, and shows
that even with less-than-ideal conditions this kind of approach
is educationally justified. As I have argued elsewhere (Yarrow:
1990), it is a way of empowering learners and enabling them
to begin to take responsibility for themselves: this is clearly
one of the key aims of the projects and it is vital in the Indian
context if any kind of shift of attitude and practice is to
occur.
The basic stories used were adaptations of traditional or well-known
tales; performance forms suggested to the children included
mime and movement, rhythm and music, masks and facial expression.
Throughout all sessions the aim was to stimulate questions,
not to inculcate ready-made answers. Observation by team members,
teachers and myself suggests that one of the major educational
gains was the cultivation of a questioning attitude.
Project 2: Jagruti
I
initially visited two schools, both in the public sector. Returning
18 months later I visited a further 3 municipal schools, one
of which had joined the scheme at its own request. Activities
were again clearly popular, attention and participation excellent,
support from teachers and heads enthusiastic and results impressive
in terms of things the children had made and composed. Even
though in both projects there was not always complete consistency
of the project team and there were a number of interruptions
for holidays and exams, the rapport continued to be good and
it was apparent that the children readily picked up the thread
again. Teachers were supportive in spite of the heavily exam-syllabus-oriented
operation of schools in the Indian system. (In the long term
this is a problem which needs addressing at all levels up to
MA: possibilities for real learning are all too frequently suffocated
by force-feeding of material for regurgitation).
The initial outline indicates that the focus of the project
is essentially on the ability and responsibility of the individual.
The initial group of schools comprised four from the public
and four from the private sector, focusing, as with Awakening
Awareness, on sixth-grade children. The project takes eight-week
blocks per issue: it receives funding from ETC. New Delhi, for
a period of three years from April 1994. It emphasizes the intention
to open out environmental education beyond the confines of an
exam-oriented set of statistics.
The Annual Report 1995-96 records further planning meetings
and workshop at the start of the second year, building on the
experiences of the first. Three topic (water, garbage, energy)
were covered in year one, and two (air and sound pollution,
tree) developed for year two. Again, performances presented
the issues and subsequent class sessions were structures around
activities. In both years a closing function for all schools
at Darpana allowed children to present the results of their
work in their own performances; and the AMC School Board organized
a further function for its participating schools in 1996. Approaches
were also made by Doordarshan (TV), who filmed versions of the
original performances for later release on its children's programme;
and an invitation to an international workshop, Children in
Charge for change, resulted in a presentation, contact with
other NGOs, and inclusion in a write-up of NGOs' experiences
in environmental education and participatory schemes (reviving
Links, IUCN, Netherlands).
A case study of the project to date includes results of the
questionnaire/interviews with participating children in order
to determine outcomes. The questionnaire aimed to assess the
suitability of the communication approach adopted by Jagruti:
the knowledge and awareness gained by the students; resultant
action by participants.
Results indicate that the initial performance (compared to subsequent
demonstrations), survey forms, etc.) was far and away the most
effective communicative method, remembered by virtually all
students who were interviewed with reference to each of the
first three topics covered (100%, 90%,100% respectively). Practical
activities (making toys from waster materials, making a compost
pit) also produced high retention in the case of topic 2 (50-75%).
Questions about specific details indicated greater diversity,
but in nearly all cases students had grasped the essential issue
and retained a significant proportion of detailed awareness
about, for example, specific causes of wasting energy and water
or types of garbage and appropriate and inappropriate disposal
methods. Subsequent action (talking to others, changing habits)
was taken by a similar, and quite impressive, proportion of
students, very frequently in excess of 50%.
The case study concludes that the communication approach was
popular and effective; performing arts is a powerful educational
tool and its use should be extended to other areas; knowledge
-awareness-skill (KAS) gain of students shows a positive trend;
more emphasis should be placed on the subsequent action phase
in future. It further adds some general comments on environment
education, including the following: 'to foster comprehension
of complex wholes… the effective environment must be extended…
to include the entire life-space of the student'; 'in addition
the attitudinal climate needs to be one that frees the students
emotionally to struggle with problems for which there are no
easy and specific solutions';' the approach should be…
to develop educational environments for facilitating a re-examination
of basic premises, values, attitudes and perception.'
After two years most of the children who have participated in
these two projects have moved to different (secondary) schools.
However, they take with them in many cases an awareness of and
enthusiasm for the methods and issues involved; and a positive
climate has been created in the schools. Further work may need
to take different forms (discussions are underway about the
formation of ECO-clubs).
Project 3: Parivartan
The
selected performers, some with experience in community work
and all with some artistic ability in indigenous music and dance,
though not thought of as performance, underwent a two-month
training (one month of workshops on basic performance skills,
awareness of issues, project methods; followed by initial visits
to villages and subsequent planning of performance schedules).
Trainers included the Jagruti team (on environmental issues),
a representative from the Behavioural Science Centre (BSC),
women's organizations (Jyoti Sangh, Ahmedabad and Sahiyar Group,
Baroda), the Aga Khan Rural Support Group, and Darpana staff.
During the programme the performers were not only sensitized
to the issues but also socialized to the methodology by being
invited to contribute their knowledge and skills, share in planning
and develop discussion skills.
The original intention was to deal with a single topic each
year (year 1: rural development; year 2: status of women; year
3: reproductive health), and to cover three aspects of each
topic through performance and follow up. This schedule has been
interpreted fairly liberally, in that the first rounds of performance
have been concerned with alcohol abuse, blood feuds, and witchcraft.
Performances on the first two topics were held in over thirty
villages, with between 100 and 500 people attending each. Some
discussion took place after the performance and some between
performers and host; the following day the performance team
visited families in the village for follow-up discussion. Following
the sessions, around 50 people pledged to give up alcohol and
4 villages agreed to resolve family feuds by negotiation. Villagers
requested that the performances be shown in other communities
also, but this was not possible within the schedule. A video
recording of the two performances was completed.
I attended a performance on the topic of witchcraft in Khedbrahma
district, along with some 200 to 300 villagers and the video
team. The latter meant that this was a more 'formal' event than
some previous performances. It was also interrupted by one of
India's frequent power-cuts, but nobody minded very much. The
style was presentational, street-theater, using traditional
song, dance and narrative techniques derived from Bhavai and
framed by a short contextualization and commentary by the project
leader. Clearly the audience (from small children to village
elders) enjoyed the performance. The (male) elders, questioned
afterwards, were emphatic that it had enlightened them and given
them new perspectives, both on categorizing women as witches
and on giving credence to witchdoctors. They claimed that they
would amend their behavior in future and pointed out that they
had stopped abusing alcohol after a previous performance. Younger
men confirmed this and said that attitudes and behaviour had
changed and that they very much favoured this. The men said
they were proud that members of their families were performing
with the team. The performers themselves claimed that their
lives had changed significantly that they were pleased and proud
to be with the team (the leader and co-workers confirmed that
the performers, particularly the women, had gained immensely
in confidence and self-respect over the first year). Questioned
by a fellow visitor, an American female theater-worker, the
women were adamant that they wished to go on with performance
and work of this kind even after the end of the current project.
Clearly these initial results are encouraging, particularly
from the point of view of the reception of the performances
and the sustained change in the performers themselves. Social
attitudes in adults are unlikely to change overnight, but there
is evidence both of significant shifts and of a willingness
to consider hitherto acknowledge possibilities. Some doubts,
of course remain, to do with the inevitably somewhat agit-prop
format and ' missionary' zeal of performers and 'converts'.
It is clear that these relatively unsophisticated people could
be swayed by other messages from apparently authoritative sources.
Against this, however, it should be pointed out that the performers,
performance-form and project leader all have roots in the community
and are therefore neither accorded undue reverence nor given
particularly 'exotic' credibility.
Assessment
The
reports above make it clear that all three projects have had
success in many respects. They each set out to promote a growth
of knowledge and awareness, to instigate changes in attitude,
to stimulate subsequent responsible action, and to do all this
by essentially performative and interactive methods which themselves
articulate a model of learning, growth and change.
Methods
The
methods used in the projects are tried and tested in many parts
of the world, though somewhat less familiar in India.TIE (threatre
in Education) is well-known in Britain as an educational methodology
and as a way of raising awareness of issues, mainly in primary
schools ( up to age 11); similar methods have been widely used,
for example, in AIDS education in Africa. TIE usually starts
with a performance and is followed up by interaction and discussion
between the performance team and the target group; it also not
infrequently involves subsequent project work, normally organized
within the school by teachers. Thus performance leads into ongoing
group and individual work. In addition to the focus on specific
(e.g. environmental) issues, the methodology itself is perceived
as transferable: learning through multi-media input and through
doing is recognized as highly effective in many subjects.
Performative and interactive work with adults has major avenues
of application in the socio-political and therapeutic spheres.
The work of Augusto Boal (see his Theater of the Oppressed)
uses a variety of forms of interactive and participatory performative
situations (e.g. apparently 'impromptu' dramatized events or
debates; Brechtian scenarios in which audience members are invited
to take over characters' roles and indicate what they would
do in the situation). Boal's principles include the development
of listening skills, internalizing theater language, writing
scenarios and incorporating alternative perspectives. There
have been a number of applications of comparable methods in
India, notably in Calcutta (Badal Sircar, Arun Mukherjee [Jana
Sanskriti]), Kerala (KSSP), Karnataka (Ninasam), Tamil Nadu
(ARP) and Delhi (Janam): these and other examples in Asia are
documented in Eugene van Erven, The Playful Revolution (Indiana
University Press, 1992). Drama therapy, much of it deriving
from J. L. Moreno's Theater of Psychodrama, invites clients
to dramatize problematic or traumatic events from their own
lives in order to enable them to perceive the causative dynamics.
Here also, therefore, performance both articulates new insights
in a more thorough way and also invites participation and involvement
in the cognitive process.
Implementation
The
projects have been thoroughly prepared and have functioned within
a strong support network, including not only Darpana personnel
but also workers in social and environmental organizations,
with back-up support from educational leaders and financial
support from both Indian and international sources. Project
teams were thoroughly briefed and trained, and have frequently
reconvened for further training and discussion. Not only the
teams themselves but also the recipients have been consulted
and involved in subsequent planning, ensuring ownership of the
projects by as wide a spectrum as possible. The ethos of working
together cooperatively which is found in performance contexts
is particularly strong here, and has communicated itself to
all involved. Both creative enjoyment and strong sense of commitment
are evident throughout the project teams.
Outcomes
Knowledge
and awareness gain is evident, both in the questionnaires administered
as part of Jagruti, but also from direct responses
of participants after performances and during follow-up sessions.
Since the acceptance and internalization of new information
is the initial stage in any reorganization of a living system,
this platform is crucial to subsequent phases.
Change in attitude has clearly followed, in the cases, for instance,
of children becoming alert to the need to conserve water and
of villagers becoming aware that specific behavioral patterns
were damaging to the community and could be changed. What occurs
in this phase is the conscious realization that alternative
possibilities exist. This realization can then lead to the assumption
of individual or collective responsibility for action and change
i.e. an element of conscious intention enters the scene: internalization
becomes desire and leads to activation. All these phases have
been evident in the projects described. Whether action for change
is maintained over a span of time depends on a large number
of factors, many of which lie outside the scope of the projects
(e.g. the influence of parents, social environment, other aspects
of education, economics, etc.). It does, however, appear that
in the relatively short term a good deal of such positive action
has been initiated and maintained.
Difficulties and strategies for resolution
Difficulties
experienced fall mainly into three areas: logistical (time available,
access to target group), resourcing (relatively small size of
project teams, doubts about ongoing funding) and some aspects
of methodology (how best to transform positive perceptions into
sustainable action).
The first two require continued planning and consultation, for
example, with educational authorities and funding bodies. Clearly,
in the case both of schools and rural schemes, the optimum future
scenario is for the projects to be extended to a wider constituency,
and for this to occur as a result of action from within the
target community: in other words, in the case of school principals,
teachers, children and perhaps also parents to receive training
from the initial project teams and then to take over the major
responsibility for future provision, with the project team remaining
available for back-up. In the case of rural communities, the
same process, with the personnel being drawn from the villagers,
would be appropriate. Here is already a back-up organization
in the shape of the Manav Kalyan Tust, which operates many awareness-raising
and social programmes.
In this context the interdependence of issues and methods needs
to be emphasized. Any group which takes these projects forward
needs to be provided, not merely with the relevant arguments
and information, but also with the confidence and ability to
communicate this through interactive and performative means.
The whole thrust of the programmes is empowerment: it is vital
for their effective continuance that the participatory mode
does not become diluted to a passive form of reception.
The third issue raised above suggests the need for adding a
stage to the process, or strengthening it where it is already
in use. Currently the projects are strong on producing knowledge
and awareness gain and relatively strong on instigating individual
and communal shifts in attitude. To strengthen further the link
between the undertaking of individual responsibility and the
cementing of this in ongoing action (as well as to offer more
learning-by-doing experience) more attention needs to be given
to devising ways for participants to work together in small
groups. This further internalizes understanding, spreads the
burden of responsible action an lessens any anxiety which may
be experienced in trying to influence a large group, particularly
where as in the villages it may contain authority figures.
The relatively low cost of the projects (they involve personnel
rather than plant and can largely be coordinated within limited
areas) and the opportunity to divide funding responsibility
between several agencies – local, national and international
– favors their extension and continuation. Additionally,
many of the issues targeted are likely, in the long term, to
deliver social and environmental improvements which will be
cost-effective. The projects fulfill their intention to deliver
both values and value.
Conclusion
The
fundamental proposal of the projects is that performance (understood
in a wide sense) is a highly effective means of ‘environmental’
(again in a wide sense) education. It directly stimulates and
instigates educative activity in individuals and offers them
methods and opportunities for learning to work together. Such
learning and doing creates changes in attitude and perception
of the individual’s environment which issue into extended
forms of interpersonal and social reorganization. Participants
begin to reconfigure their world.
For all of us, that world depends largely on our relationships
with our ‘environment’, whether we understand that
in terms of the ‘others’ we live with (other sex,
other race, other interracial groups, other religions, other
species) or the natural phenomena surrounding us, and from which
we are likewise not necessarily as separate as we have tended
to assume.
The work then is outreach in many senses: involving our sense
of who and what we are and how we perform our relationship to
the world of which we are a part.
All
violence constructs an other: it distances ‘self’
from ‘other’. It is based in the non-availability,
the covering-up, of the sense of non-differentiation: that is,
in the illusion that there is only the ‘skin-encapsulated
ego’. It is fed by fear: the fear of invasion of ‘my’
space, ‘my’ body, ‘my’ language, by
what has been demarcated as ‘other’. The demarcation
is a form of categorizing, partitioning, sectioning; always
involving hierarchy, role-assumptions, symbolic orders of some
kind.
In performance, people touch. They touch themselves: they have
to get in touch with their bodies, their emotions, rather than
deny them. They experience directly, without the curtains of
abstract terminology, what it is to feel. They empathize (with
characters they are watching); they sympathize (with other human
beings who can feel similarly); as audience they join together
in feeling, they share pain or anger, they experience together
the joy of a new insight or an unexpected resolution. So here
they begin to touch one another, to sense that other is not
always different from self, that ‘me’ and ‘my
environment’ may be coextensive. The hierarchies and the
barriers become more permeable. If they then learn to perform
more consciously together, they extend that touching, that direct
awareness and intone-ness. They begin directly to participate
in themselves, in each other, in their environment: to commune
and to communicate.
Clearly these initiatives are of more than local significance.
Their importance in the national context is underlined by events
like Ayodhya, plague, governmental corruption, by much in the
history of post-independence India; and by similar events throughout
the world. Education has to start by activating the capacities
of individuals to take appropriate measures, to develop in and
for themselves the ability to judge and respond, to learn that
they can become responsible for their own attitudes.
This is not the only viable form of art, nor the only way to
develop responsibility: but it is a practical, testable and
direct addition to the aesthetic and educational repertoire,
which deserves widespread dissemination, not least because it
challenges everyone to rediscover in themselves their own ability
to care and to express that in practice. |